Global Warming, Peak Oil, Resource Depletion, and Sustainable Living

  My Profile   Log In   Register Free Now   
Global Warming, Peak Oil, Resource Depletion, and Sustainable Living Planet Thoughts Advanced       Click to see one of our videos, chosen at random from the database, along with its PlanetThought
 Try a video
Home   About   Books&Media   Resources   Contact  
   News   Quote   Review   Story   Tip   All   Blogs   News   Quotes   Reviews   Stories   Tips
Get Email or Web Quotes
or get PlanetThoughts via RSS:
 Full  Blog  News
Read & Comment:
Paul Krugman's Errors An...
Why Climate Change Is An...
22 Most Beautiful Houses...
The Nightmare After Chri...




Most recent comments:
From Farm To Fork
A Simple List: Things We...
Can the affluent rest at...

Actions:
Bookmark the site
Contribute $
Easy link from your site
Visit Second Life
Visit SU Blog
  Technorati




Brighter Planet's 350 Challenge





Blog item: 76% Of Cap And Trade Bill Allowances Benefit People, Not Polluters

Recommend this:  Hover here and click below to recommend this PlanetThought     Email a Friend     See Related

0 comments   Add a comment   Author:  dotcommodity (Sep-11-2009)
Categories: Economic/Financial, Global Warming, Renewable Energy Sources

Since the Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade bill is designed to reduce pollution by paying people who reduce pollution with money from polluters, it comes in for all the usual criticism from the fossil industries. They claim Al Gore something something, there's no global warming, scientists didn't consult me, it was cold yesterday and so on.

However, it also comes in for some anger from the rest of us, who do support the idea of funding a transfer to a renewable energy economy, but worry that we will pay higher costs and believe that the Cap and Trade bill gives too many initial free allowances to polluting industries. But this anger may be unwarranted.

Consumers are shielded from rising energy costs with most of the allowances:

Initially 76% and then 83% of allowances benefit people not polluters

The amount of allowance value directed to consumers or for other public benefit (more renewable energy, efficiency, low-carbon transportation technologies, green-collar job training, and the transition to a low-carbon economy) totals 76 percent of the cumulative allowance pool from 2012 through 2025 and 83 percent from 2012 through 2050. (WRI)

For the poor, subsidies would completely offset any rising cost of fossil energy.

This primarily affects the South, where more people depend on coal-powered electricity, are poorer, and live in rural areas. Congress plans to vary the size of the rebate to reflect other factors such as region of the country or vehicle ownership, providing larger rebates to families living in very cold or very hot climates or in rural counties where people have to drive longer distances.

Because many of the poorest Americans - those who are disabled and the elderly - have no jobs, the allowances for reducing the impact of higher energy costs initially would be in the form of a higher Cost of Living Adjustment to SSI, and for those on food stamps would be transferred electronically to an EBT account without any increase in administrative costs. For the working poor, an expansion in the Earned Income Tax Credit would be used to help offset higher energy costs with virtually no increase in administrative costs or bureaucracy. For the rest of us, it would come as tax rebates and subsidies.

Three accounts would be set up to fund these allowances.
(1) The Strategic Reserve Fund.
(2) The Climate Change Consumer Refund Account.
(3) The Climate Change Worker Adjustment Assistance Fund.
These would use the deposits of funds to pay out subsidies and rebates. The beneficiaries would be not fossil industries but downstream businesses and energy consumers.

Utilities are prevented from passing along costs to customers.

Utilities would be more highly regulated under the bill than now. Business as usual would end. Like utilities in the Renewable Portfolio Standards states do now, they would have to buy more renewable energy like solar and wind. They would not be able to keep on using fossil fuels as they get more expensive, and merely raise prices for their customers. There is a fixed credit or rebate on electricity bills to counteract any rising costs of fossil fuels due to Cap and Trade, funded by the The Climate Change Consumer Refund Account. This would be audited with the results available on the internet.

States would have to use 50% of their emission allowances to provide direct financial assistance to consumers with energy rebates and cost-effective energy efficiency programs to reduce their overall fossil fuel costs.

As our investments as a nation in renewable energy pays off we would all get rebates

Renewable energy is much cheaper than fossil energy once the initial capital investment is paid off, as there are no ongoing fuel costs. Once deposits are made to the Climate Change Consumer Refund Account, the Secretary of the Treasury would provide tax refunds on a per capita basis to each household in the United States, divvying up the the total deposited into the Climate Change Consumer Refund Account.

Only 8% of the free allocations go to polluters

The regulated entities, which are coal fields and point of entry oil and gas pipelines would initially get 8% of the free allocations. The amount increases increases to 23 percent in 2014 then declines again, reaching zero by 2025.

Source: http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/76-of-cap-and-trade-bill-allowances-benefit-people-not-polluters/  
Related PlanetThoughts.org reading:
  CBO Scores Senate Climate Bill - Will Save $21 B... (Dec-18-2009)
  Sulfur Cap-And-Trade Lessons Learned: Success As... (Dec-13-2009)
  The Story Of Cap And Trade Deception, A Failed M... (Dec-10-2009)
  EU Paper Industry Has Cut Carbon Pollution By 42... (Nov-23-2009)
  What The Senate Should Know About Cap And Trade ... (Sep-29-2009)
  EU chief: 'Energy and climate are today's coal a... (Sep-7-2009)
  Lobbyists Forge Letters Urging Vote Against Waxm... (Aug-19-2009)
  California Unveils Latest Plan to Curb Emissions (Oct-18-2008)
  Global Warming Getting Political Cold Shoulder i... (Oct-14-2008)
  Carbon tax seen as best way to slow global warming (Oct-10-2008)

Click one tag to see readings related specifically to that tag; click "Tags" to see all related readings
  
^ top
Add a comment    
  Follow the comments made here? 
  (Please log in or register free to follow comments)

  
^ top 
About author/contributor Member: dotcommodity (Susan Kraemer) dotcommodity (Susan Kraemer)

Member: dotcommodity (Susan Kraemer) I write about the solutions for the fix that humanity finds itself in with climate change and the end of the oil age, and about renewable energy and climate change and sustainable living for several online publications.
Real Time Oil Price Watch: 

Visit Green Wave Email Marketing
Email Marketing for You and Your Planet

Learn more about
interactive climate models

Quick Enviro-Polls

PlanetThought Writers   
(click to see their work):

Recommended Sites

  Member of:
GOtham Green networking
Green Collar Economy
New York Academy of Sciences
Shades of Green Network

  PlanetThoughts
     Members/Affiliates *

Approaching the Limits
    to Growth
EcoEarth.Info
Environmental News Network
EESI.org
GreenBiz.com
GreenHomeBuilding.com
Heroin and Cornflakes
NewScientist
ScienceDaily


* Members of PlanetThoughts      
  communities on SU or MBL,      
  and blog article affiliates      

  Other Favorite Blogs
21st Century Citizen
Center for Bio. Diversity
Easy Ways to Go Green
EcoGeek
Good Bags
Opposing Views


Valid my RSS feeds


We Do Follow

ClickBlog.org



  Volunteer      Terms of Use      Privacy Policy  

Copyright © 2014 PlanetThoughts.org. All Rights Reserved.
Except for blog items by David Alexander: Some Rights Reserved.