Global Warming, Peak Oil, Resource Depletion, and Sustainable Living

  My Profile   Log In   Register Free Now   
Global Warming, Peak Oil, Resource Depletion, and Sustainable Living Planet Thoughts Advanced       Click to see one of our videos, chosen at random from the database, along with its PlanetThought
 Try a video
Home   About   Books&Media   Resources   Contact  
   News   Quote   Review   Story   Tip   All   Blogs   News   Quotes   Reviews   Stories   Tips
Get Email or Web Quotes
or get PlanetThoughts via RSS:
 Full  Blog  News
Read & Comment:
Why Climate Change Is An...
22 Most Beautiful Houses...
The Nightmare After Chri...
From Farm To Fork




Most recent comments:
From Farm To Fork
A Simple List: Things We...
Can the affluent rest at...

Actions:
Bookmark the site
Contribute $
Easy link from your site
Visit Second Life
Visit SU Blog
  Technorati




Brighter Planet's 350 Challenge





Blog item: Obama's Atomic Solyndra?

Recommend this:  Hover here and click below to recommend this PlanetThought     Email a Friend     See Related

2 comments, last: Apr-23-2012   Add a comment   Author:  NoNukes (Apr-18-2012)    Play a Video
Categories: Peak Oil/Gas & Energy Demand, Philosophical & Quality of Life, Political, Pollution

Secretary Chu and Tom Fanning at a Plant Vogtle tour on February 15, 2012.The future of nuclear power now hangs on a single decision by President Obama---and us.

His Office of Management and Budget could cave to the unsustainable demands of reactor builders who cannot handle the standard terms of a loan agreement.

Or he could defend basic financial procedures and stand up for the future of the American economy.

You can help make this decision, which will come soon.

It's about a proposed $8.33 billion nuke power loan guarantee package for two reactors being built at Georgia's Vogtle.   Obama anointed it last year for the Southern Company, parent to Georgia Power.  Two other reactors sporadically operate there.  Southern just ravaged the new construction side of the site, stripping virtually all vegetation.

It's also stripped Georgia ratepayers of ever-more millions of dollars, soon to become billions.  This project is in the Peach State for its law forcing the public to pay for reactor construction in advance.  When the project fails, or the reactors melt, the public still must pay.  A taste of what's coming has emerged in shocking defects in poured concrete at the site which will cost millions to correct and months of delay on a project whose construction has barely begun ( http://nukefree.org/nc-warn-vogtle-already-hit-major-design-flaw-delay ) .

Nonetheless, Southern runs virtually no financial risk.  It actually has an interest in never finishing.  Florida is now in turmoil, trying to rid itself of a similar Construction Work in Progress law ( http://nukefree.org/florida-legislators-sue-stop-nuke-bailouts-advance ).

Worldwide estimated reactor costs have jumped from $3-5 billion each a few short years ago to $10 billion or more, and rising.

Uranium prices are set to soar as the supply of Russian weapons-based fuel is about done.  And renewables have long since outstripped atomic energy as being cheaper, faster to build, cleaner, safer, more reliable and open to community ownership.

There are virtually no private investors willing to back new reactor construction.  There are no private insurers willing to take the risk on operating reactors.  There is no place to store the radioactive wastes they generate.

Operating reactors in Vermont ( http://nukefree.org/vermonters-tell-vermont-yankee-get-out ), New York, California ( http://nukefree.org/nrc-chair-jazcko-says-san-onofre-be-shut-indefinitely ) and elsewhere now face ferocious public uprisings to get them shut.

They are being joined by Governors, US Senators and entire legislatures.  Peter Shumlin, Governor of Vermont, has appeared at a major public rally to shut Yankee.  The legislature long ago voted (26-4) the same way.  Shumlin was joined by US Senator Bernie Sanders, who has issued a stunning denunciation of the loan guarantees ( http://nukefree.org/sen-bernie-sanders-ryan-alexander-stop-nuclear-subsidies ) .  US Senator Ron Wyden of Orgeon has published a serious warning about the on-going dangers of Fukushima, which he recently visited ( http://nukefree.org/sen-wyden-warns-situation-fukushima-worse-believed ).

Once the public kills one of these elderly reactors, a tsunami of shutdowns among the 104 currently licensed in the US will follow.

Germany and much of the rest of Europe have abandoned the technology ( http://nukefree.org/europes-war-over-nuclear-financing ).  Bulgaria has just scrapped plans for two proposed generators.  Major banking institutions have warned potential investors in Britain's planned reactors that if they proceed, they will lose their financial standing.  Mexico has also said it won't build new nukes.

In Asia, only one of Japan's 54 licensed reactors now operates, and it may soon shut.  Huge demonstrations and hunger strikes are raging against a proposed project at Koodankulam, India.  The Philippines says it won't build any reactors at all ( http://nukefree.org/philippines-says-no-new-nukes ).  China, the last bastion of any apparent large-scale interest in multiple nukes, seems to be wavering, in part because of the rise of a No Nukes movement there.

Here, two reactors barely beginning construction in South Carolina are also in deep trouble.  Their builders need massive rate hikes in North Carolina to proceed, and the opposition there is fierce ( http://nukefree.org/ncwarn-north-carolina-can-kill-south-carolina-nuke-project ).

But the lynchpin is Vogtle.  The construction loan guarantee program got $18.5 billion from George W. Bush in 2005. With the industry in deepening chaos, it took until last year for a president to designate less than half that money.  For the first time in years, there is no Executive or Congressional request to put more money into the fund.

The French National Utility EDF did step forward to get funding for Maryland's proposed Calvert Cliffs project.  But haggling over terms contributed to its demise.

Now Southern faces the same abyss.  It refuses what the mortgage community would consider a normal 20% downpayment on its taxpayer-funded loan.  Southern wants to put virtually none of its own money into the project, leaving the radioactive gamble totally to the public.

But the Office of Management and Budget is apparently demanding something more reasonable ( http://nukefree.org/vogtle-loan-guarantee-not-yet-done-deal ).  Because the OMB is a White House agency, Obama holds the key.  It's our job to make him turn it in a green direction.

A short while ago, this package was considered a done deal.  But the GOP uproar over the failed $535 million loan to the solar company Solyndra changed to context.  Initiated by Bush, Republicans have made Solyndra the poster child for bad federal loans.

Vogtle involves some 15 times Solyndra's liability.  And it's all Obama's.  At least three petitions are circulating against the package.( http://nukefree.org/please-do-sign-petition-stop-new-nuke-loan-guarantees ).

There are many ways to finally shut down what has been the most expensive technological failure in human history.  Fukushima and the killing power of radiation, the unsolved problem of radioactive waste, the campaigns against failing reactors such as Vermont Yankee, Indian Point, San Onofre and Davis-Besse---all are key.  This weekend, a conference convened by the Sierra Club in Washington, DC ( http://action.sierraclub.org/site/DocServer/no_Nukes_Flyer2.pdf?docID=9701 ), will weigh the various strategies.

But killing this loan guarantee package could finally kill the prospect of new reactors in the US.  The astonishing rise of Solartopian green technologies has far outstripped atomic energy in the marketplace.  Every delay deeply diminishes the possibility of building more of these profoundly uneconomic anachronisms.

In the long run, Vogtle, Summer and any other new nukes that seem to slip through in the short term will almost certainly be stopped by what has become one of the most powerful non-violent social movements in human history.

But right now, it's up to Obama---and us.  Does he really want an atomic Solyndra on his hands?  Will we really let this happen?

Let's relieve the President of this radioactive burden.  Let's kill these reactors before they kill us, and take the most significant leap of all toward a green-powered Earth.

Related PlanetThoughts.org reading:
  Why Should Nuke Guarantees Cost Less Than Home O... (Jul-5-2012)
  Could A Solar Green White House Finally Face The... (Oct-15-2010)
  On Being A Pro-Nuclear Environmentalist (Oct-7-2010)
  Is The 'Nuclear Renaissance' Dead Yet? (Oct-5-2010)
  Apocalypse In The Gulf Now (Oil) & Next (Nukes) (Jun-9-2010)
  Another Week On The Trek Toward A Drastically Ch... (Apr-6-2010)
  The Reactor Relapse Takes Three Hits to the Head (Nov-12-2009)
  Obama has fed his Green Jones to King CONG (Sep-7-2009)
  Uranium and the Secret Society (Aug-12-2009)
  Walter Cronkite, Three Mile Island And 'Lamar's ... (Jul-22-2009)

Click one tag to see readings related specifically to that tag; click "Tags" to see all related readings
  
^ top
Add a comment    
  Follow the comments made here? 
  (Please log in or register free to follow comments)
Comment by:  PT (David Alexander) (Apr-23-2012)   Web site
Intuitively I believe that nuclear power is very dangerous, and that many thousands were killed or injured (or were born with birth defects) due to Chernobyl. And Fukishima bears the same imprint; perhaps not as intense as Chernobyl, but much more prolonged over time. That said, I feel I would need to research a lot more in order to feel comfortable with conclusions. It is hard to find information that is unbiased, thorough and scientific, and that is understandable in terms of stating clear conclusions.

I do know that a scientific reactor in Long Island, where I live, has contaminated some of the drinking water, and that every time you scratch the surface, nuclear energy is an economic and health threat. The other area where I wish it was more clear is to understand the potential for solar and hydro energy sources to totally replace nuclear and fossil fuels. Much reading and analysis is needed.
  
Comment by: City Worker (Apr-22-2012)   

I found the video, “Fukushima Disaster Documentary: Is Nuclear Power Safe? Chernobyl, and Thorium 16 Sept 11” to be an incredibly good, informative video. Yet, I believe the message of the video is slanted, with respect to the safety or lack of safety of nuclear energy.
In particular, I am speaking of the short mention in the “Fukishima” video of Chernobyl. I believe certain aspects of the Chernobyl disaster were not given their due. The video inferred, only in passing, that the lives and health of those who worked on the site and helped with the cleanup might have been affected. But, in “The Best of Chernobyl Documentary 2006 The Battle of Chernobyl”, it was noted that 500,000 risked their health and lives to prevent a “second explosion…that would have wiped out half of Europe.” It got me thinking: had things been handled differently –had some people not died or allowed their health of be destroyed - HALF OF EUROPE might have been destroyed!
Also, although it was proper and very informative of the “Fukishima” video to speak of the results of a large-scale international project – the “Chernobyl Forum” of 2006, I believe that wasn’t sufficient. The video mentioned that the study’s conclusion was that the only form of cancer that people from the Chernobyl region got was thyroid cancer, and that only a few thousand people got it. But what about the conclusions of the video: “Children of Chernobyl (Warning: Graphic)” that congenital heart defects and cancer had increased 250% in the region and that there were children born in that region with horrendous birth defects?

  
^ top 
About author/contributor Member: NoNukes (Harvey Wasserman) NoNukes (Harvey Wasserman)
   Web site: http://www.SolarTopia.org

Member: NoNukes (Harvey Wasserman) Free Press Senior Editor and "Superpower of Peace" columnist Harvey Wasserman is author or co-author of a dozen books including SOLARTOPIA! Our Green-Powered Earth, A.D. 2030; Harvey Wasserman's History of the U.S.; and, A Glimpse of the Big Light: Losing Parents, Finding Spirit.

With Bob Fitrakis, Harvey has helped expose the theft of the presidency. Their freepress.org coverage has prompted Rev. Jesse Jackson to call them "the Woodward and Bernstein of the 2004 election." Their books include How the GOP Stole America's 2004 Election & Is Rigging 2008, and What Happened in Ohio?, coming soon from the New Press.

Harvey's widespread appearances throughout the major media and at campuses and citizen gatherings have focussed since the 1960s on energy, environment, peace, justice, U.S. history and election protection.
Real Time Oil Price Watch: 

Visit Green Wave Email Marketing
Email Marketing for You and Your Planet

Learn more about
interactive climate models

Quick Enviro-Polls

PlanetThought Writers   
(click to see their work):

Recommended Sites

  Member of:
GOtham Green networking
Green Collar Economy
New York Academy of Sciences
Shades of Green Network

  PlanetThoughts
     Members/Affiliates *

Approaching the Limits
    to Growth
EcoEarth.Info
Environmental News Network
EESI.org
GreenBiz.com
GreenHomeBuilding.com
Heroin and Cornflakes
NewScientist
ScienceDaily


* Members of PlanetThoughts      
  communities on SU or MBL,      
  and blog article affiliates      

  Other Favorite Blogs
21st Century Citizen
Center for Bio. Diversity
Easy Ways to Go Green
EcoGeek
Good Bags
Opposing Views


Valid my RSS feeds


We Do Follow

ClickBlog.org



  Volunteer      Terms of Use      Privacy Policy  

Copyright © 2014 PlanetThoughts.org. All Rights Reserved.
Except for blog items by David Alexander: Some Rights Reserved.