Living in Peace and Wisdom on our Planet

  My Profile  Log In   Register Free Now   
Living in Peace and Wisdom on our Planet Planet Thoughts Advanced       Click to see one of our videos, chosen at random from the database, along with its PlanetThought
 Try a video
Home   About   Books&Media   Resources   Contact  
   News   Quote   Review   Story   Tip   All   Blogs   News   Quotes   Reviews   Stories   Tips
Get Email or Web Quotes
or use our RSS feeds:
New Feed:  Fossil Fuel
 Full  Blog  News
Read & Comment:
A Solar Community In Isr...
'Let's You And Him Fight...
Paul Krugman's Errors An...
Why Climate Change Is An...

Most recent comments:
From Farm To Fork
A Simple List: Things We...
Can the affluent rest at...

Bookmark the site
Contribute $
Easy link from your site
Visit Second Life
Visit SU Blog

Blog item: The Two Cultures in the 21st Century

    Email a Friend     See Related

2 comments, last: May-29-2009   Add a comment   Author:  evolutionaryme (May-27-2009)    Play a Video
Categories: Philosophical & Quality of Life, Sustainable Living

Lord C.P. SnowThere was a sense of urgency in the air at the New York Academy of Science's Symposium on "The Two Cultures in the 21st Century", presented earlier this month. The inspiration for this event was the fiftieth anniversary of a lecture, "The Two Cultures," presented on May 7, 1959 by Lord C.P. Snow at Cambridge University that discussed the growing gap between scientists and literary intellectuals in the mid-twentieth century. Lord Snow could not have anticipated that his lecture would begin a debate within the realms of science and the humanities that is as relevant today, if not more so, than when he delivered his speech.

The significance of Lord Snow's lecture was readily apparent throughout the day. Three renowned keynote speakers provided food for thought for all attendees – E.O. Wilson, Pulitzer-Prize winning Harvard biologist; the Honorable John Edward Porter, former congressman and Board Chair of Research!America; and Dean Kamen, world-famous entrepreneur, founder of DEKA and FIRST, and inventor of the Segway.  In addition, four distinguished panels discussed topics such as "How to More Effectively Communicate Science Issues to the Public" and "Restoring Science to its Rightful Place in Politics."

The urgent undertone to the day revolved around the importance of all scientific disciplines (social and economic sciences, as well as life and hard sciences) in resolving many of the crises our global community faces.  At the same time, the communication gap between scientists and "others", no matter how you define "others", is hampering the ability of scientists to get the support they need to address the imperative issues we all face.

One of the more interesting discussions that emerged is how to define the "second culture", assuming the "first culture" is comprised of scientists. Does Lord Snow's definition of literary intellectuals still hold today?  The consensus was that it does not.  Some participants proposed that the divide is really between intellectuals in general, both in the sciences and arts, versus everyone else.  However, it was pointed out that many in the arts are not educated in the sciences.  Others suggested the second culture could be religious people, those involved in politics or "couch potatoes."  Perhaps, there are actually more than just two cultures.

In any case, it became clear very quickly that a key question is how to reach more people outside the scientific community so they understand and care about the science behind some of the crucial concerns of the day. As pointed out by the panel on science communication, the world of science writing is shrinking as the publishing industry fights for survival.  With executives at the helm who have little regard for science reporting, this category is one of the first to be cut when budgets contract. There is a demand for science information, as revealed by the popularity of shows such as PBS' Nova or NPR's Science Friday radio broadcasts.  However, there is still the impression among many that science doesn't sell.

At the same time, as pointed out by Francesca Grifo of the Union of Concerned Scientists, the misuse of scientific data by the Bush Administration in the United States and the attention it received demonstrates the great value placed on science in the sphere of public policy. People look to scientists as experts who will solve many of the great challenges we face. How can we take the respect accorded to scientists and add public excitement to the mix to create a groundswell of support that will result in major changes in how decisions are made and policy is implemented?

Symposium participants offered many suggestions to increase understanding and public support for scientific endeavors. There was agreement about the importance of science education for children and adults, as well as how much work there is to be done. Some ideas mentioned included teaching more history of science as a bridge between the humanities and the sciences, and training science journalists in the art of translating technological jargon into understandable and interesting writing.

A theme repeated throughout the day is the need for scientists to connect better and more often with the public in schools, the media, government, on the Internet and through other venues.  Scientists must find ways to once again make science awe inspiring, as it recently has inspired more fear with issues such as global warming and swine flu. Congressman Porter encouraged more scientists to run for public office. Shawn Otto of Science Debate, Inc. wants to see more televised election debates around science-related issues. Grifo discussed the difficult culture scientists face at some universities and laboratories where engaging with the public is actually discouraged and doing so can impede professional advancement. Kevin Finnerman, Editor-in-Chief of Issues in Science and Technology, the policy journal of the National Academy of Sciences, pointed out that scientists themselves must become more open-minded to other points of view and more willing to dialogue with non-scientists.

Teaching and learning science should be fun and excitingThe final keynote speaker, Dean Kamen, left us all inspired with an example of how to motivate non-scientists, in this case children, to want to learn about science. In 1989, he founded the nonprofit organization For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST). Kamen recognized that to increase the supply of science-literate citizens, you must begin by getting kids excited about science.

To do this, he thought about what excites them in modern culture, namely the entertainment and sports industries, and created a program modeled after the world of sports. FIRST partners school children with employees from science-related businesses in the U.S., such as engineering firms, and forms teams to solve engineering puzzles. The teams enter local and national competitions that award prizes for the best solutions.

In the 20 years since its inception, FIRST has reached thousands of children in the U.S. and abroad. A study conducted by Brandeis University in 2003-2004 found a significant increase (as compared to the general population of students) in the number of FIRST participants who attend college, take science courses and chose science majors.  It was exhilarating to see a creative approach to teaching science really works.

Kamen's example is a wake-up call for everyone to do their part to immediately begin to engage the general public in science much more effectively. Some of the speakers emphasized that each of us should use our strengths to get this job done. Those with good speaking skills should get out there and dialogue with adults from other industries and spheres of influence or reach out to principals and teachers in schools. The writers among us should be more diligent to write books and articles that the public can understand. If you've toyed with the idea of running for public office, perhaps seriously consider doing so. Others could advocate within universities or laboratories to change the culture to encourage engaging with the public.  Just think of something to do and then go do it!

Related reading:
  'An Uncontrolled Experiment On The Planet' - fro... (Mar-2-2009)
  Replace GDP with Something That Reflects Real Qu... (Mar-2-2009)
  The Greenhouse Effect and the Bathtub Effect (Feb-2-2009)
  New Study Shows Climate Change Largely Irreversi... (Jan-30-2009)
  Climate 'Hockey Stick' Is Revived (Sep-9-2008)
  WAKE UP CALL: Mass Extinctions And 'Rise Of Slim... (Aug-13-2008)
  Biodiversity Is Crucial To Ecosystem Productivity (Apr-26-2008)
  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system (Feb-20-2008)
  Climate Set for 'Sudden Shifts' (Feb-5-2008)
  Global Warming: How Do Scientists Know They're N... (Oct-25-2007)

Click one tag to see readings related specifically to that tag; click "Tags" to see all related readings
^ top
Add a comment    
  Follow the comments made here? 
  (Please log in or register free to follow comments)
Comment by:  PT (David Alexander) (May-29-2009)   Web site
Yes, Sherry, I agree. We each have unique skills, current employment and contacts, free time, funds, and how we talk and think. It is good to do SOMETHING -- it is energizing for the individual, as well.
Comment by: SherryRivera (Sherry Rivera) (May-27-2009)   

The summary was interesting and inspiring. It is a call to action that many of us should consider heeding.

^ top 
About author/contributor Member: evolutionaryme (Gail Koelln) evolutionaryme (Gail Koelln)
   Web site:

Member: evolutionaryme (Gail Koelln) Gail Koelln is President of GK Grant Writing, a grant writing consulting firm established in 2006. As the former Development Director at Queens Theatre in the Park from 1999 to 2006, Gail has many years of experience researching sources of funding and preparing proposals and reports for foundations, corporations and government agencies. She also worked as the Grants Specialist for Queens Borough President Claire Shulman, where she provided technical assistance regarding fundraising to nonprofit organizations in Queens and processed grant awards from the Borough President for nonprofits. Gail has a Master’s degree in Zoology, a Bachelor’s degree in Biology and a passion for evolutionary spirituality and environmental causes. She is currently the Chair of Gotham Green (a business and social networking group for green businesses in New York), a writer for, a former Chair of the New York City Sierra Club’s Endangered Species Committee and a former docent for the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Bronx Zoo.

Visit Green Wave Email Marketing
Email Marketing for You and Your Planet

We won a Gotham Green Award for 2010, on Earth Day! Thank you Gotham Networking for this award.

See the attractive event brochure.

Recommended Sites

  Member of:
GOtham Green networking
Green Collar Economy
New York Academy of Sciences
Shades of Green Network

     Members/Affiliates *

Approaching the Limits
    to Growth
Environmental News Network
Heroin and Cornflakes

* Members of PlanetThoughts      
  communities on SU or MBL,      
  and blog article affiliates      

  Other Favorite Blogs
21st Century Citizen
Center for Bio. Diversity
Easy Ways to Go Green
Good Bags
Opposing Views

Valid my RSS feeds

We Do Follow

  Volunteer      Terms of Use      Privacy Policy  

Copyright © 2020 All Rights Reserved.
Except for blog items by David Alexander: Some Rights Reserved.