Living in Peace and Wisdom on our Planet

  My Profile  Log In   Register Free Now   
Living in Peace and Wisdom on our Planet Planet Thoughts Advanced       Click to see one of our videos, chosen at random from the database, along with its PlanetThought
 Try a video
Home   About   Books&Media   Resources   Contact  
   News   Quote   Review   Story   Tip   All   Blogs   News   Quotes   Reviews   Stories   Tips
Get Email or Web Quotes
or use our RSS feeds:
New Feed:  Fossil Fuel
 Full  Blog  News
Read & Comment:
A Solar Community In Isr...
'Let's You And Him Fight...
Paul Krugman's Errors An...
Why Climate Change Is An...




Most recent comments:
From Farm To Fork
A Simple List: Things We...
Can the affluent rest at...

Actions:
Bookmark the site
Contribute $
Easy link from your site
Visit Second Life
Visit SU Blog




The true meaning of the hacked emails will become clear after further review; one needs also to distinguish the ethics of those involved as compared with the overall validity of climate change scienceBy Kevin McCann

Why it matters:

A handful of scientists guilty [(possibly) - ed.] of improper conduct does not refute the science of climate change and allowing talking heads to make that argument is unacceptable and dangerous.

Recap:

This "just in" from the New York Times (and many thousands of other new sources)… Hacked and leaked emails from the University of East Anglia in Great Britain have climate change skeptics bristling.  The messages, ten years worth, are considered by some the smoking gun that proves scientists have "conspired to overstate the case for a human influence on climate change."

The emails in question, attributed to "prominent American and British climate researchers," run the gamut from whether or not to make public certain data, to personal attacks on skeptical colleagues.  In at least one such exchange, the authors suggest finding ways to have skeptical scientists removed from the editorial boards of peer-reviewed journals.

Commentary:

Whoo-boy!  The talking heads are loving this story.  Some (inexplicably) claim these emails are irrefutable proof that global warming is a hoax.  The other side asserts this is just scientists being scientists, at worst guilty of leaving out confusing data that might confuse lay-persons.

Two of the most level-headed commentaries about this "scandal" come from The Colbert Report, where Yale professor Dan Esty asserted that the scientists had (ill-advisedly) omitted some data to simplify the climate change debate.  Well, they got what they deserved, an over simplification of the debate…as Colbert (and some of his pundit peers) put it, "They lied => Global warming not real."

But if satire isn't your bag, Popular Mechanics' Peter Keleman, a geologist with "30 years of research experience, takes a much more clinical approach.  In short, he condemns the authors of the emails, asserting that their actions and attitudes only harm efforts for climate action.  Like Esty, he concludes with what we know for certain about climate change, most notably: the greenhouse effect is fact, CO2 levels are dangerously high and rising at an unprecedented rate, and these CO2 levels have risen exponentially in correlation with human industrialization.

Some of the talking heads are gleefully claiming these emails are the smoking gun that proves climate change is a myth.  But with the vast majority of the scientific community accepting the reality of human-induced climate change, the only thing these emails prove is that a few scientists felt threatened by the skeptics and weren't willing to let the facts speak for themselves.

There is one gun analogy that does fit beautifully though.  Keleman points out that many climate change models show disastrous effects in the near future, some in the next ten years.  To do nothing, Keleman asserts, would be the equivalent of playing Russian Roulette.

At a recent presentation about just how risky continuing with business as usual would be, MIT Professor Dr. John Sterman took it a steep further to say it would be like playing Russian Roulette with 16 of 17 chambers loaded.  I don't like those odds.

[Editor's note: an excellent layperson's review of this topic can be found at Wikipedia]

See original story: EcoMattersDaily.com  
Related PlanetThoughts.org reading:
  Solar Funnel (Sep-23-2010)
  Climate Interactive: The Bridge to Copenhagen (Nov-13-2009)
  The N.Y. Times Finally Reports the Economic Disa... (Jun-2-2009)
  MIT: Climate Change Odds Much Worse Than Thought (May-19-2009)
  The Greenhouse Effect and the Bathtub Effect (Feb-2-2009)
  Robin Chase: Getting Cars Off the Road and Data ... (Dec-27-2008)
  New System Captures Significantly More Wave Ener... (Dec-27-2008)
  Jackson Browne Nails Nuke Power on Colbert (Oct-6-2008)
  MIT President Hockfield Urges Congress to Fund E... (Sep-26-2008)
  MIT opens new 'window' on solar energy (Jul-25-2008)

Click one tag to see readings related specifically to that tag; click "Tags" to see all related readings
  
^ top
Add a comment    
  Follow the comments made here? 
  (Please log in or register free to follow comments)
Comment by:  PT (David Alexander) (Dec-10-2009)   Web site
I agree, William. This just allows the borderline believers in scientist conspiracy theories to dive deeper into the deep end of the pool.
  
Comment by:  Wavehunter (William Coffin) (Dec-8-2009)   Web site

Recent reports suggest the hacking was carried out by 'professionals' in Russia, paid for by ... who? Somebody who wants to derail the Copenhagen negotiations. I wouldn't put it past some of our larger corporations.

The commentator Johann Hari makes the point well that, even if we totally discount all the findings from the university in question, their results are corroborated by "Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, L'Academie des Sciences, the Indian National Science Academy, the US National Academy of Sciences, the Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, the UK's Royal Society, the Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Russian Academy of Sciences, the US Environmental Protection Agency" and many more esteemed bodies beside. (Johann Hari: How I wish that the global warming deniers were right.)

  
^ top 
About contributor GuestWriter

PlanetThoughts.org welcomes occasional articles and opinion pieces from writers who are not regular contributors. Their contributions will be listed under the "GuestWriter" name, and additional attribution will be shown in accordance with the agreement with the original writer and source of the PlanetThought.

Visit Green Wave Email Marketing
Email Marketing for You and Your Planet


We won a Gotham Green Award for 2010, on Earth Day! Thank you Gotham Networking for this award.

See the attractive event brochure.

Recommended Sites

  Member of:
GOtham Green networking
Green Collar Economy
New York Academy of Sciences
Shades of Green Network

  PlanetThoughts
     Members/Affiliates *

Approaching the Limits
    to Growth
EcoEarth.Info
Environmental News Network
EESI.org
GreenBiz.com
GreenHomeBuilding.com
Heroin and Cornflakes
NewScientist
ScienceDaily


* Members of PlanetThoughts      
  communities on SU or MBL,      
  and blog article affiliates      

  Other Favorite Blogs
21st Century Citizen
Center for Bio. Diversity
Easy Ways to Go Green
EcoGeek
Good Bags
Opposing Views


Valid my RSS feeds


We Do Follow

ClickBlog.org



  Volunteer      Terms of Use      Privacy Policy  

Copyright © 2021 PlanetThoughts.org. All Rights Reserved.
Except for blog items by David Alexander: Some Rights Reserved.